Thursday, September 17, 2026 · Petrol Rs 384.34 · USD/PKR 277.50 · Gold Rs 449336/tola
Breaking
Shehbaz Condemns ‘Dastardly’ Drone Attempt on Makkah Petrol Reaches Rs384.34; Diesel Up 10pc in Ten Days Pakistan Tells Security Council Waterway Threats Will Have Consequences Houthi Drone Destroyed Near Makkah; Coalition Calls It a Red Line DG ISPR Says Makkah Pact Has No Regional Aspirations IHC Bars Arrest and Harassment of PTI Leaders Before March JI Rejects Rs75bn Relief and Threatens Movement to Oust Government Nurse Who Saved Baby From PIMS Fire Awarded Tamgha-e-Shujaat KSE-100 Regained 1,422 Points on Tuesday; Gold Falls Rs4,000 Saudi Arabia Routes Crude Through Oman After Pipeline Shutdown China Urges Early Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz The Red Line US War With Iran Has Cost $38bn, Congressional Budget Office Says Saudi Arabia Issues Emergency Alert in Mecca Over Houthi Threat ECC Approves Rs75bn Fuel Relief but Leaves the Levy Untouched Petrol Rises to Rs380.24 as Two-Day Pause Ends IHC Bars Parties From Occupying Roads Into the Capital Houthi Attacks Injure 13 in Three Saudi Cities Constitutional Court Questions Supreme Court’s Imran Hospital Order KP Chief Minister Alleges Police Brutality on Lahore Visit
Pakistan

IHC Bars Parties From Occupying Roads Into the Capital

A three-member Islamabad High Court bench has barred political parties, leaders and provincial governments from occupying roads or public places in and leading to Islamabad, and from using state resources to facilitate marches.

IHC Bars Parties From Occupying Roads Into the Capital

The Islamabad High Court has barred political parties from occupying roads and public places in and leading to the federal capital (Express Tribune).

Who ordered it

A three-member bench led by Chief Justice Sardar Muhammad Sarfraz Dogar. The petition was disposed of.

What the order covers

Political parties, political leaders, provincial governments and public office holders are barred “from occupying public roads, highways, interchanges, toll plazas, buildings or other public places within or leading to the federal capital”.

Provincial governments must ensure “government resources, public funds, officials, vehicles, machinery and other equipment were not used directly or indirectly to facilitate any march, procession or rally heading towards Islamabad”.

Officials cannot be “compelled, coerced, induced or otherwise required to participate”. Helplines have been set up to report violations.

The reasoning

“No one has a lawful right to obstruct the free movement of citizens or interfere with their access to trade, business, education and medical facilities.”

The court held that violations would breach Articles 9, 15, 18, 23, 24 and 25A — life, movement, trade, property, and the right to education.

What the order does and does not say

It does not ban the march. It prohibits occupying roads and public places, which is a different thing from marching along them, and it forbids the use of state machinery to organise one.

That distinction will decide what happens on 27 September. A procession that moves is not an occupation; a sit-in is. PTI’s stated plan is a long march converging on Islamabad, and whether that becomes an occupation is a question of what happens when it arrives.

The provision aimed at one party in particular

The bar on provincial governments using public resources is directed at Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which PTI governs and whose chief minister Sohail Afridi is to lead the march. A helpline for reporting officials who are coerced into attending is a mechanism pointed at one administration.

The rest of the apparatus

Punjab has banned gatherings of five or more until 17 September. Rawalpindi and Islamabad have sought 15,000 additional personnel and 1,000 containers; about 500 loaded container vehicles were impounded. More than 30 PTI activists were detained under public order powers.

Jamaat-i-Islami marches on the 20th; PTI on the 27th. This order covers both.

What is not established

No penalty or enforcement mechanism beyond the helplines has been described, and PTI had not responded publicly at the time of writing. It has not been reported whether any party will challenge the order.

[Image: The Express Tribune]

Hamza Azhar SalamEditor — Hamza Azhar Salam · Write to us with suggestions or tips
Powered by: Frontpage.dev
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com