Thursday, September 17, 2026 · Petrol Rs 384.34 · USD/PKR 277.50 · Gold Rs 449336/tola
Breaking
Shehbaz Condemns ‘Dastardly’ Drone Attempt on Makkah Petrol Reaches Rs384.34; Diesel Up 10pc in Ten Days Pakistan Tells Security Council Waterway Threats Will Have Consequences Houthi Drone Destroyed Near Makkah; Coalition Calls It a Red Line DG ISPR Says Makkah Pact Has No Regional Aspirations IHC Bars Arrest and Harassment of PTI Leaders Before March JI Rejects Rs75bn Relief and Threatens Movement to Oust Government Nurse Who Saved Baby From PIMS Fire Awarded Tamgha-e-Shujaat KSE-100 Regained 1,422 Points on Tuesday; Gold Falls Rs4,000 Saudi Arabia Routes Crude Through Oman After Pipeline Shutdown China Urges Early Reopening of the Strait of Hormuz The Red Line US War With Iran Has Cost $38bn, Congressional Budget Office Says Saudi Arabia Issues Emergency Alert in Mecca Over Houthi Threat ECC Approves Rs75bn Fuel Relief but Leaves the Levy Untouched Petrol Rises to Rs380.24 as Two-Day Pause Ends IHC Bars Parties From Occupying Roads Into the Capital Houthi Attacks Injure 13 in Three Saudi Cities Constitutional Court Questions Supreme Court’s Imran Hospital Order KP Chief Minister Alleges Police Brutality on Lahore Visit
Pakistan

DG ISPR Says Makkah Pact Has No Regional Aspirations

The military spokesman described the Makkah defence agreement as purely defensive with no offensive or aggressive element, and said the operationalisation of its commitments has never been made public.

DG ISPR Says Makkah Pact Has No Regional Aspirations

Director General ISPR Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry has described the Makkah defence agreement as purely defensive (Express Tribune).

What he said

The pact has “no offensive, no interference, no aggressive element” and represents “collective deterrence” among Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Türkiye.

“There is nothing aggressive. There are no regional aspirations.”

He rejected the description “Muslim alliance”, calling it a “regional stability alliance” open to partners sharing values of “non-aggression, non-interference and collective deterrence”.

The answer on military obligations

Asked how the three would respond to an attack on a partner, he said “the operationalisation of the defensive commitments had never been made public in any discourse”, and that the three countries would decide their response among themselves.

That is the whole question, and it remains unanswered by design

A mutual defence pact whose triggering mechanism is deliberately unpublished is not a drafting failure. Ambiguity is the standard architecture of deterrence — an adversary that cannot calculate the response has to assume the worst.

But the ambiguity is being maintained on the day a drone was destroyed near the city the agreement is named after, and five weeks after signature. This newspaper noted on 10 September that an alliance producing “premature to discuss specific military protocols” one month in had disclosed something about its readiness. Six days later the formulation has changed but the content has not.

On China

Chaudhry called the pact complementary to Pakistan’s “iron-clad” relationship with Beijing: “Nobody has any problem with that, everyone understands that this is defensive.”

That reassurance was worth giving. China’s foreign minister Wang Yi met his Iranian counterpart in Beijing this week and urged that the Strait of Hormuz be reopened — Beijing is managing its own interests in the same crisis, and is Iran’s largest oil customer.

What is not established

No threshold, consultation procedure, command arrangement or timeline under the pact has been made public. India and Afghanistan were not addressed in the briefing as reported, and no Pakistani deployment change has been announced.

[Image: Screengrab via The Express Tribune]

Hamza Azhar SalamEditor — Hamza Azhar Salam · Write to us with suggestions or tips
Powered by: Frontpage.dev
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com