Tiktok looked at a disconnection system coming from the crowd in the United States on Wednesday, making the latest technological platform to adopt a Community approach to combat online misinformation, AFP said.
Footnotes, a feature that has begun to try out by the popular video sharing application in April, allows users who have been tested to propose a written frame for content that may be wrong or misleading – similar to Community notes for META and X.
“The footnotes are based on the collective knowledge of the Tiktok community, allowing people to add relevant information to content,” said Adam Presser, head of the platform and the confidence and security of the platform.
“Starting today, users of the US in the footnote pilot program can begin to write and evaluate footnotes in short videos and our US community will begin to see what is scored as useful – and evaluate them,” he added.
Tiktok said nearly 80,000 US -based users who have maintained an account for at least six months, are qualified as contracts. The video exchange app has about 170 million US users.
Tiktok said the feature would increase the existing platform integrity measures, such as the labeling content that cannot be verified and work with events, such as AFP, to assess the accuracy of positions on the platform.
Just like x
The verification system derived from the crowd was spread from Elon Musk’s X platform, but the researchers repeatedly questioned its effectiveness in combating lies.
Earlier this month, a study finding that more than 90 % of X Community notes are never published, pointing to significant limits on its effectiveness.
The Institute of Digital Republic of America (DDIA) analyzed the entire 1.76 million notes published by X between January 2021 and March 2025.
Other users then evaluate the proposed notes as “useful” or “not useful”. If the notes receive “useful” ratings from several users with different prospects, they are published in x, which appear just below the challenges.
“The overwhelming majority of submitted notes – over 90 % – never reaches the public,” Ddia’s study said. “For a commercially available program as fast, scalable and transparent, these elements should raise serious concerns.”
A huge number of notes remain unpublished due to lack of consensus between users during the evaluation.
Thousands of notes have also not been evaluated, they may never see and are never evaluated, according to the report.
When it comes to Tiktok, the platform has warned that it may take a while to publicly make a footnote, as contributors start and become more familiar with the feature.
“Most footnotes are written and scored on different issues, the smartest and most effective the system is becoming the system,” Presser said.
As with X, technological platforms are increasingly seeing community -based model as an alternative to professional control of events.
Earlier this year, Meta finished the third -party control program in the United States, with Managing Director Mark Zuckerberg saying it had led to “excessive censorship”.
The decision was widely regarded as an attempt to calm President Donald Trump, whose conservative base has long been protesting that controlling events on technological platforms serves to limit the content of free speech and censorship.
Professional researchers of the facts strongly reject the claim.
As an alternative, Zuckerberg said Meta’s platforms, Facebook and Instagram would use “Community notes”.
Studies have shown that Community notes can work to dismantle some false, such as vaccine misinformation, but researchers have long warned that it works best for issues where there is wide consensus.
Some researchers have also warned that Community notes can be motivated to target political opponents from party beliefs.
a href=”https://tribune.com.pk/story/2558980/tiktok-allows-us-users-to-debunk-misinformation”>Source link
