Through the detection of Air India, the US FAA, Boeing alerts the fuel switch locks “are safe”

• The Crash Air India exhibition emphasizes engine fuel switches.
• American FAA says the fuel switch does not lock.
• Boeing refers to FAA’s notice, it doesn’t advise any action, sources say.
  

The US Federal Air Force Administration and Boeing open a new tab have issued private notifications that the fuel switch locks on Boeing planes is safe, a document observed by Reuters They also showed four sources with knowledge of the subject.

FAA’s continued airworthiness notification on July 11 came after a preliminary report on Crash in Air India Boeing 787-8, which killed 260 people last month, asked questions about the engine cutting switches.

FAA’s notice to the authorities of Civil Aviation, observed by ReutersHe stated: “Although the design of the fuel control switch, including the characteristic lock, is similar in various Boeing plane models, FAA does not consider this issue an unsafe situation that would justify a relief instruction in any Boeing airplane models, including model 787”. “

When asked about comment, FAA said it had nothing to add beyond the notice.

Boeing also referred to the FAA alert in a multi-operator-message sent to airlines in recent days, which said Planemaker is no action, two of the sources with immediate knowledge.

When asked about comment, Boeing referred to Reuters’ questions in FAA.

Preliminary investigation report on the crash by the India Accident Investigation Office (AAIB), referring to a 2018 FAA consulting, which recommended, but did not command the operators of many Boeing models, including 787, to inspect the lack of fuel lock.

The report said Air India said it had not conducted the proposed FAA inspections, as FAA 2018 was not a mandate. However, he also said that the maintenance files showed that the butterfly control unit, which includes fuel switches, was replaced in 2019 and 2023 at the level involved in the crash.

The report noted that “all applicable airworthiness instructions and warning cards complied with the aircraft as well as the engines”.

Alpa India, who represents Indian pilots in the International Federation of Montreal Pilot Associations, in a statement on Saturday rejected the presumption of the pilot error and requested a “fair, research -based facts”.

“The body of pilots must now become part of the research, at least as observers,” Alpa India Sam Thomas president told Reuters on Sunday.

Alpa India, in a letter published in X, said the preliminary investigation report referred to 2018 FAA Counseling “on the gates of the fuel control switch, which indicates possible equipment malfunction”.

At the last moments of the flight, a pilot was heard at the pilot’s voice recorder, asking the other because he cut the fuel. “The other pilot replied that he didn’t do it,” the report said.

He said that the fuel switches had almost simultaneously turned over from running to cut off immediately after take -off. The report did not say how switches could be reversed during the flight.

Two US security experts said on Saturday that they supported Alpa India’s request to be observers for the researcher, but said the research report did not propose a prejudice for the pilot error.

John Cox, a pilot and former spokesman for Alpa US, said the AAIB report seemed objective and fair.