Royal expert reacts as Prince Harry was left out of Sandhurst’s military playbook

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry critic and royal expert Angela Levin has weighed in after the Duke of Sussex’s absence from the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst’s major new book.

Speaking to X, formerly of Twitter, the royal author tweeted: ‘Harry has left Sandhurst’s major new book. The army swears allegiance to the Monarchy, but Harry continues to attack them.’

Also read: Does Hollywood see Meghan Markle, Prince Harry as a ‘joke’?

He further said, “Furthermore, in his memoirs Spare wrote that the Army taught him to see the enemy as less than human, which is contrary to military behavior.”

Commenting on it, one fan said: “Great news…. And appropriate.”

Prince Harry completed his training at Sandhurst in Camberley, Surrey in 2005 and left as a Probationary Officer in 2006.

Talking to you The sun of the development, former British army commander Richard Kemp said: “I completely understand why it has not been included.

“But it’s not a disappointment that I don’t see him in there,” Richard Kemp said.

The former commander said: “I don’t think he (Harry) did anything particularly remarkable during his tenure, but he was certainly an important person to go to Sandhurst. I suspect that the recent disharmony between him and the royal family has led to them to decide against having him in.”

Read more: Prince William says Kate Middleton will do a ‘good job’ ‘filling his mother’s shoes’

He continued, “One thing he said in his (Spare) book was that his army was taught to see the enemy as less than human – something they didn’t teach us. That has overshadowed a lot of the great things he’s done.”