Friday, October 23, 2026 · Petrol Rs 377.71 · USD/PKR 277.05 · Gold Rs 439036/tola
Breaking
 Dar Departs for Istanbul to Attend First-Ever R-4+E-3 Foreign Ministers’ Meeting Deputy Commissioners in KP Given Power to Detain Without Charge Four Police Killed in Karak, Including a CTD Superintendent KSE-100 Falls 2,007 Points — Worse Than Emergency Day Pakistani Among Injured as Dammam Airport and Shaybah Hit PM Announces Rs160bn for KP With 70pc to Merged Districts Diesel Now Rs14 Dearer Than Petrol as the Gap Keeps Widening IMF Sees Weak External Position and Holds Growth at 3.5pc Lahore Is the World’s Most Polluted City Again Gul Plaza Had No Fire Alarms or Safety Measures Dar to Attend First R4E3 Foreign Ministers’ Meeting in Istanbul Government to Form JIT in Mir Raza Case Harry Brook Smashes Record-Breaking 202 as England Post 429-4 Against Sri Lanka in Rawalpindi Field Marshal Vows Total Defeat of Terrorists and Their Ideology Earthquake in Tibet Kills Sixteen NCCIA Rescues Karachi Teenager from Dark Web-Linked Network That Ordered Her to Poison Cat, Harm Herself Petrol Price Cut by Rs1.60 Per Litre, High-Speed Diesel Increased by Rs1.64 Under New Daily Pricing Mechanism Magnitude 7 Earthquake Strikes Tibet, Killing at Least 16 and Injuring 32 Lahore Tops Global Ranking of Most Polluted Cities with Hazardous AQI of 344 US Orders Staff Out of Saudi Arabia as Blasts Hit Southern Iran
Pakistan

Gul Plaza Had No Fire Alarms or Safety Measures

An inquiry into the commercial building fire found no alarms and no safety provision — the same category of failure as the Peshawar school collapse.

Gul Plaza Had No Fire Alarms or Safety Measures

The Gul Plaza commercial building in Karachi had no fire alarms and no safety measures, according to findings reported by The Express Tribune.

The category of failure Gul Plaza belongs to

This is the third structural safety failure this newspaper has reported in nine days, and they share a shape.

A school roof collapsed in Peshawar on 15 October, killing 35 — 34 of them children. The FIR alleged substandard materials, a building unsuitable for use as a school, and earlier complaints that went unaddressed.

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa then ordered structural inspections of every government school. The building that collapsed was private, and no equivalent regime was announced for the sector where the failure occurred.

Gul Plaza is a commercial building. The same question applies: who was responsible for inspecting it, and what did they certify?

What inquiries of this kind usually produce

A finding that safety provision was absent is not in itself an accountability outcome. It identifies a gap; it does not identify who was paid to close it.

Buildings of this type require approvals from municipal and civil defence authorities. An inquiry that names the absence of alarms without naming the officials who signed off on occupancy has described the symptom.

What has not been published

The casualty figure, the date of the fire, who conducted the inquiry, and whether any case has been registered.

This report rests on The Express Tribune and has not been corroborated against a second outlet.

Who certifies a building like this

A commercial building needs approvals from the municipal authority and, for fire provision, from civil defence. Occupancy of Gul Plaza implies someone signed for both.

No official has been named in the reporting and no case has been registered. An inquiry that records the absence of alarms without identifying who certified their presence has described the symptom.

[Image: The Express Tribune.]

Sources: The Express Tribune.

frontpage.dev’s AI newsroom produced this report. AI agents synthesized and fact-checked it from multiple sources, under human editorial oversight. Spotted an error or a concern? Email Editor-in-Chief Hamza at hamza@thepakistandaily.com.

Hamza Azhar SalamEditor — Hamza Azhar Salam · Write to us with suggestions or tips
Powered by: Frontpage.dev
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com