Friday, October 16, 2026 · Petrol Rs 390.23 · USD/PKR 277.05 · Gold Rs 437836/tola
Breaking
Case Registered Against Peshawar School Owners After Roof Collapse Kills 31 School Owner Arrested Over Peshawar Roof Collapse KP Orders Structural Checks on Every Government School Federal Constitutional Court Ends Challenge to Afridi’s Appointment Naqvi Calls Direct Rule a Last Resort After Talks Stalled Opposition Alliance Calls Off Talks With the Government DNA Findings Prompt Fresh Scrutiny in Hina Javed Murder Investigation KSE-100 Climbs 769 Points as Rebound Gathers Pace Petrol Cut to Rs390.23 as Diesel Edges Up Again Peshawar High Court to Hear Challenges to KP Governor’s Rule on October 20 Gold Holds at Rs437,836 After Thursday’s Sharp Fall Trump Rules Out Nuclear Weapons Against Iran FBR Extends Income Tax Return Deadline to 31 October Pakistan to Chair IMF and World Bank Governors After 74 Years Nawaz Sharif’s Cars Vandalised in London, CCTV Shows Masked Men IHC Gives PTI More Time to Respond in Case Seeking Ban on Imran Khan’s X Account Drought Drives Thari Herders and Livestock Out of the Desert Two Killed as Landslides, Snowfall Disrupt Travel Across Gilgit-Baltistan Trump Predicts Swift End to Iran War as Tehran Rejects Pressure to Submit IMF Warns Middle East Economies Face Lasting Scars From Regional War
News

Islamabad High Court slams FIA for harassing journalist Rana Arshad

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) slammed the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) for harassing and intimidating journalist Rana Mohammad Arshad.

The detailed order issued by the IHC held that the FIA had acted with haste and recklessness which resulted in the harrassment of the journalist and his family during a raid at the journalist’s house.

Arshad’s lawyers argued that because the journalist shared pro-democracy opinions on social media, he was being harassed by the FIA’s Cybercrime Wing.

On the other hand, the investigating officer submitted a written report in which he claimed to have visited the journalist’s house only to verify his address and for no other reason.

The Islamabad High Court held that the investigation officer did not provide any evidence of wrongdoing against the journalist.

“He has further stated that, during the course of the investigation, no incriminating material whatsoever could be collected against the petitioner,” read the IHC’s order.

“In response to the query of this Court, he explained that the petitioner was summoned because the cellular number mentioned in the complaint was registered in his name. He could not give a plausible explanation for sending the undated notice or failure to disclose the purpose for summoning the petitioner,” stated the court.

The IHC said in the detailed order that the petitioner had claimed that he was harassed because of his critical views on social media against state functionaries.

“Such an apprehension or fear in the mind of a person who is engaged in the occupation of reporting and dissemination of information to the public not only undermines the independence of the occupation but is intolerable in a society governed under a Constitution,” stated the IHC.

“Freedom of speech and expression is the most cherished human right and fortifies the other constitutionally guaranteed rights.”

“The state and its agents cannot be allowed to use power and authority to silence voices and to retaliate against critical reporting or dissent. Only informed citizens having access to an independent and free press can ensure progress, prosperity and security of the state,” stated the IHC’s order.

Hamza Azhar SalamEditor — Hamza Azhar Salam · Write to us with suggestions or tips
Powered by: Frontpage.dev
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com