Monday, October 26, 2026 · Petrol Rs 377.71 · USD/PKR 277.05 · Gold Rs 424536/tola
Breaking
Asif Khaliq drives blue-eyed Chaiwala Arshad Khan’s London success Munir and Naqvi Join Makkah Pact Talks in Tehran Iran Says the Border Is Open as Pakistan Ships LPG by Sea Six Militants and Two Soldiers Killed in DI Khan Imran Khan’s Sisters Held for Another 30 Days Rights Commission Calls for the KP Emergency to End Makkah Pact Officials Head to Tehran for Security Talks Riyadh Airport Partly Reopens Two Weeks After Attack Indian Duty-Free Access Threatens Pakistan’s Textile Edge Peshawar Begins Polio Drive for 1.11 Million Children KSE-100 Loses 4,045 Points Over the Week Task Force Asks Industry for Export Proposals PTI Weighs Talks Against Protest Over KP Seven of One Family Killed in Murree Road Accident Mir Raza’s Father Asks for a JIT Member to Be Replaced Pakistan Rejects a $490m Loan as Too Expensive Minister Seeks Loan Rescheduling as Rates Bite at 25pc 31,000 Consumers Denied the Petrol Subsidy Portal Glitch Blocks Returning Pakistanis From Filing LPG Cargoes Down to Two as Senate Presses on Winter Fuel
Pakistan

ECP Bars Three Ex-MNAs Over Undeclared Asset Statements

The Election Commission has declared three former MNAs ineligible to contest any election until they file their statements of assets and liabilities for 2024-25.

ECP Bars Three Ex-MNAs Over Undeclared Asset Statements

The Election Commission has barred three former members of the National Assembly from contesting elections for failing to file their asset statements (Dawn).

Who

Zartaj Gul, Sahibzada Hamid Raza and Abdul Latif.

For what

Failure to submit the Statement of Assets and Liabilities — Form-B — for the financial year 2024-25, under section 137 of the Elections Act, 2017.

The order

“The commission vide Order dated 07.08.2026 has declared the delinquent ex-members of the National Assembly ineligible to contest any general election, by-election, Senate election and local government election.”

How long it lasts

Until they file. This is not a fixed-term disqualification: section 137 suspends eligibility while the default continues, and the remedy is entirely in the defaulter’s hands.

That distinction matters, because a bar that ends when a form is submitted is an administrative sanction, not a penalty. It is designed to compel a filing, and it succeeds or fails only on whether the filing arrives.

The context that complicates it

All three were sentenced to 10 years’ rigorous imprisonment by an anti-terrorism court in Faisalabad in July 2025, which triggered disqualification under Article 63(1)(h) of the Constitution.

So the practical effect of the ECP order is limited. Each is already disqualified on a separate and far more serious ground, and the constitutional bar does not lift when a form is filed.

What the order does is keep the administrative default on the record alongside the conviction — which is the ECP doing its own job rather than treating a court’s finding as making its own redundant.

What is not established

No response from any of the three has been reported. It has not been reported whether their convictions are under appeal, and this newspaper has not independently examined the July 2025 judgments. Readers should treat the convictions as reported facts about court proceedings, not as our assessment of them.

[Image: National Assembly website via Dawn]

Hamza Azhar SalamEditor — Hamza Azhar Salam · Write to us with suggestions or tips
Powered by: Frontpage.dev
WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com